The late term ghoul

Author	Comment
Isabelle101		#21	[-]
(Wed, Jun 10, 2009 7:15 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Loufran, 60,000 tortured and murdered children mean nothing to these people. They support and applaud the gruesome act of drilling a hole through a child's skull and sucking out her brain or butchering her alive. They think its funny and get a kick out of the thought of blood seeping out of a mother's womb after it has been raped and her child murdered within her. They love killing as long as the victims have no say and no defense. Anyway, this was merely an act of a person exercising their right to choose. He chose to shoot an child killer. Since they are pro choice, certainly they must support his right to choose abortion for Tiller. Unless they are hypocrites. God Bless, Isabelle
Brojees		#22	[-]
(Wed, Jun 10, 2009 7:46 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Oh Lord! Loofy has called in Ms Satan herself, Izzy!! Whew, that sulphur stench is strong! Where have you been Izzy? Walking to and fro about the earth?
Eliza DoLots		#23	[-]
(Wed, Jun 10, 2009 8:34 PM) Resident Crocheter & Graphics Artist Wiz Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Isabelle, like so many of her ilk, obviously believes that once a baby is born, it loses all rights and become subordinate to all the other yet to be born babies. Adults, obviously, have no rights. So, the pregnancy would kill the woman...why would that be a problem? As long as the baby isn't harmed it's all good, right? It's not even hypocritical, it's inhuman.
Isabelle101		#24	[-]
(Wed, Jun 10, 2009 8:51 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	A person'a birthday is merely an occasion or event in their life like graduation. It is not their life. To dismember a person alive before or after their birthday is gruesome and barbaric. It is an act of premeditated murder equal to any other. To advocate this most extreme violence against the innocent and defenseless is inhuman. It is not the child who loses her humanity but the child's killers who do. I'm glad I dropped by to correct you. Many prayers for your conversion, Isabelle
Eliza DoLots		#25	[-]
(Wed, Jun 10, 2009 9:50 PM) Resident Crocheter & Graphics Artist Wiz Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Again....the woman is meaningless to Isabelle. Female misogynists are a particular brand of evil.
Ichigo Kurosaki		#26	[-]
(Thu, Jun 11, 2009 1:55 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	I guess I should have warned you about Dizzy Izzy. She's like Randall Terry and believes murder is OK, as long only those already walking around are being killed. Fetuses are überimportant to Izzy, the rest of us are fucked.
Joaquins Handmaiden		#27	[-]
(Thu, Jun 11, 2009 6:06 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Say what you will. God does have the last word. Indeed he does. One look at humankind's tragically bloody and oppressive history all on account of him, is total proof of that. One look at the hideous events that fall under "acts of God" that occurred in the last couple thousand years is total proof of that. God doesn't seem to like humankind very much. That's my conclusion. God's "kindness and mercy" that we hear so much about is completely eclipsed by his vengeful and jealous nature. He is, after all and by his own admission, a "jealous God". And he means to make sure that we don't forget that, one way or another. He didn't even have mercy on his own son who asked that the cup be taken from him. Why should we expect any from him for us? So on the contrary, I don't think the "murder" of some embryos and feti annoy God. I think it doesn't even faze him. Considering all he's done himself to reduce our numbers through wars over him, disease, volcanoes, earthquakes, tsunamis, fires, etc., abortions are but a minuscule blip on his radar screen. If he's angry over it at all, I think it's because he had nothing to do with it, but rather, man had the audacity to do it instead.
Ichigo Kurosaki		#28	[-]
(Thu, Jun 11, 2009 10:44 AM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts
paxpatriot		#29	[-]
(Thu, Jun 11, 2009 2:07 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	The rhetoric of the would be domestic terrorists American Taliban here is part of what made this murder happen/
SciFiGuy		#30	[-]
(Thu, Jun 11, 2009 5:15 PM) Ye Board Taker-Carer-Of'er Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Eliza wrote: I think the jury's out on that one, Guy. My impression was it is a male phenomenon but research suggests it might not even be real. Some say it's the general shrinkage of some older people that makes the nose and ears seem to be bigger than they were. That's completely irrelevant to the point I was making. Once again, you miss the forest for the trees. You do that all the time: You focus on the specific example rather than the general point. The point is, people are constantly changing. Someone who is 85 does not look the same as when they were 25. Why is that? Their bodies changed, right? The point is that we are constantly changing, from the moment of conception until we die of old age. For someone to say that we are not human until we are 9 months old is ridiculous. We are human from the moment of conception until the day we die. And all during that time, we are constantly changing. For someone to say that we are not human beings until we are 9 months old is political statement, not a biological one. I agree with the position that a mother should have the right to terminate a pregnancy if her own life is in danger. However, Eliza's arguments above would seem to suggest that all abortions are conducted because the mother's life is in danger -- which is not the case. Some abortions -- indeed, probably most abortions -- are conducted for no other reason than because the mother wanted to abort the pregnancy. Last Edited By: SciFiGuy Thu, Jun 11, 2009 5:23 PM. Edited 2 times.
paxpatriot		#31	[-]
(Thu, Jun 11, 2009 6:20 PM) Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	"Some abortions -- indeed, probably most abortions -- are conducted for no other reason than because the mother wanted to abort the pregnancy. " What an inane statement. The abortion is done cause they decide to have an abortion? That is pretty fucking stupid-clearly there are reasons they choose not to bring the FETUS to term. The claim a collection of cells is a human being is doubtful at best, as well.
Eliza DoLots		#32	[-]
(Thu, Jun 11, 2009 8:06 PM) Resident Crocheter & Graphics Artist Wiz Reply Quote More My Recent Posts Message Me Connection Blocking Invite Ignore User's Posts	Perhaps, Guy, you are just posting a tree and expecting people to grasp the concept of forest? To suggest that the changes which happen after birth are anywhere near the changes that happen before birth is ludicrous... Once born we don't go through a phase where we breath through gills. We don't (with extremely rare exception) have a tail for awhile. We are always just versions of the same being. Smaller or larger, wrinklier or smoother, hairier or not....but we never go through a phase where we have attributes which are not normally considered human. Because of this fact, it never occurred to me you were actually trying to suggest the situations were analogous. As they so obviously are not, I just addresses the words you had written. Perhaps we can manage not to derail the thread over this? Further, this thread is about late term abortions not all abortions. Late term abortions account for somewhere around 1% of abortions. I even noted in my post that I was referring to late term abortions. The overwhelming majority of late term abortions are wanted pregnancies that threaten the life of the mother or are so badly deformed as to be unable to survive. Forcing those women to give birth is cruel. Apparently, cruelty is something to be celebrated by a few. Your statement: However, Eliza's arguments above would seem to suggest that all abortions are conducted because the mother's life is in danger -- is, minimally, incorrect.

Yuku free message boards

Quick Reply